BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(3)

 TUGASAN BERKUMPULAN (4.1.2021)

6. Definisi Operasional & Organisasi Kajian (Bab 1) #Jomtulistesis

Bab 1 seterusnya, kita pergi 1.8 iaitu definisi operasional. Ok ini agak sukar ye, kadang-kadang pelajar ni dia agak keliru. Operasional bermakna tentang definisi kajian yang kita jalankan. Bukan definisi konsep, bukanlah definisi macam contoh pelajar buat, apa makna wacana, 1. Apa makna skrip 1, tekstual 1, animasi 1, cerita 1, rakyat 1, Melayu 1. Itu salah ya, kita bukan nak definisi itu. Kalau definisi tiap-tiap satu, pelajar akan rujuk kamus dewan sahaja dan semua jenis kamus. Jangan! Jadi operasional ialah tentang kajian kita. Biasanya definisi operasional ini minimum 2 dan paling maksimum 3, tentang bagaimana kita nak jalankan kajian ini supaya bila pembaca baca baru faham , ohh ini maksud dia. Jadi kalau kita tengok tajuk ini, kita boleh ambil 1 wacana tekstual, lagi 1 skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu. Kalau kita nak ambil bezakan skrip animasi tiada kaitan pula. Jadi kita boleh teruskan, untuk tajuk ini mungkin ada dua. Tajuk yang lain mungkin ada tiga. Kalau kita ambil tajuk daripada kejuruteraan contohnya, mungkin operasional ada banyak sebab banyak pemboleh ubahnya. Kalau daripada tesis Sains pun begitu, ada banyak pemboleh ubah yang membolehkan kita membuat definisi operasional supaya pemeriksa faham apa kaitan itu dengan tesis tersebut. Kalau kita tengok tesis dalam bentuk ekonomi juga begitu. Ada banyak  pemboleh ubah, mungkin lebih dari 3. Jadi untuk yang ini, kita fokus kepada 2, awak boleh buat begini kemudian letak contohnya, wacana tekstual tetapi wacana tekstual yang awak nak buat definisi operasional ini mesti berkaitan dengan kajian. Pastikan bahawa ambil dan perlu ada rujukan. Ada satu cara, 1 maknanya awak buat wacana tekstual, berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Wacana tekstual yang berfokus kepada skrip animasi, wacana tekstual ini akan dianalisis dengan menggunakan 3 elemen. Contoh 3 elemen ini iaitu kandungan, konteks dan andaian. Jadi menurut Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), wacana tekstual apa dia apa dia, bolehlah ada rujukan dan juga 1.8.2 iaitu skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu. Ini perlulah berkaitan dengan kajian awak, huraikan serba ringkas. Skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu terdiri daripada 20 cerita, sebab dalam tesis yang dianalisis 20 cerita. Jadi skrip animasi ini berbentuk apa dia, huraian. Mungkin yang ini skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu awak huraikan berkaitan dengan kajian kita, tak ada pula rujukan, tak apa boleh diterima sebab definisi ini berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Jadi ada 2 cara, satu cara, mempunyai rujukan, ini ada rujukan, ini ada rujukan. Yang kedua, tiada rujukan, maknanya awak buat huraian. Huraian wacana tekstual itu dari segi konteks awak punya tesis. Jadi tiada rujukan, dua-dua boleh diterima. Tetapi macam saya katakan sebelum ini, rujuk penyelia. Kalau penyelia kata ada rujukan, letak rujukan. Kalau penyelia kata tak apa, saya percaya kalau tak ada rujukan pun saya faham dan ini sebenarnya tidak perlu rujukan kerana berkaitan dengan rujukan awak. Pun boleh diterima. Kita berbeza pendapat, berbeza sekolah jadi different school of taught jadi pemikiran kita berbeza. Jadi kalau ada 1 juta penyelia, ada 1 juta pemikiran yang berbeza. Terpulang kepada  penyelia. Macam saya kalau saya kata tak perlu kerana berkaitan dengan kajian bagaimana awak nak jalankan kajian nama pun operasional, operation. Kalau ada rujukan, pastikan tidak boleh rujuk kamus. Dah kenapa nak rujuk kamus. Kena rujuk kajian-kajian, bukan kamus. Menurut Kamus Bahasa Dewan Edisi Keempat, wacana tekstual ialah blab la bla tak boleh, itu kita pun tahu. Jangan rujuk kamus. Jadi, kita rujuk kajian daripada orang lain. Satu boleh rujukan, kedua ada rujukan pun boleh diterima, terpulang kepada penyelia masing-masing. Kalau penyelia kata ada, terimalah, perlu akur kata penyelia. Jadi kita lihat, kita teruskan iaitu 1.9 iaitu organisasi kajian. Organisasi kajian ini sebenarnya terpulang kepada individu/pelajar/penyelia. Selalunya saya akan suruh pelajar PhD untuk letak organisasi kajian, kadang-kadang pelajar Master pun boleh, tak letak pun boleh, jika perlu. Organisasi kajian ini awak buat dalam bentuk perenggan. Jadi perenggan pertama, apa ada dalam bab 1, kemudian perenggan kedua apa ada bab 2, kita nak buat secara ringkas organisasi kita supaya apabila penyelia baca, ohh bab 1 ada ini rupanya. Penyusunan tesis kita secara teratur, jadi perenggan-perenggan dalam ringkasan sahaja. Kerana tiap-tiap pengenalan dalam bab dah katakan dah, tetapi dalam organisasi kajian ini kita kena nyatakanlah secara ringkas apa yang ada. Pelajar PhD memang saya wajibkan supaya dia sendiri boleh faham kajian dia tiap-tiap bab. Kalau pelajar Master nak buat boleh, tak buat pun tak pe. Bacelor pun sama, pelajar Diploma pun tiada masalah jika nak buat terpulang kepada penyelia. Akhir sekali, 1.10 baru masuk kesimpulan, semua bab mesti ada kesimpulan. Tidak ada kesimpulan tidak boleh, kita nak simpulkan apa yang ada dalam bab tersebut. Saya dapati ada tesis yang tidak ada kesimpulan, tergantung tiba-tiba dah masuk bab 2. Jadi tidak ada kesinambungan bab 1 dengan bab 2. Macam bab 1 ada bab lain, macam ada entiti lain pula. Tidak ada kaitan pula dengan bab 2. Kita kena ada kesimpulan, simpulkan apa yang ada dalam bab 1. Ingat ayat akhir, kita kena letak kaitkan dengan bab seterusnya iaitu bab 2 akan membincangkan sorotan kajian... barulah kita lihat ada kesinambungan antara bab 1 dengan bab 2. Serupa juga dengan bab-bab lain. Akhir kesimpulan mesti nyatakan apa ada dalam bab seterusnya. Kadang-kadang ada penyelia kata tidak perlu kerana pemikiran berbeza. Bila berbeza kita redha dan terima. Kita dah habis bab 1, lupa nak cakap halaman. Berapa halaman bab 1 ya Prof? Halaman bab 1 lebih kurang 8-10 sahaja. Itu yang saya kata bahaya kerana ada pelajar letak sampai 30 sebab masalah kajian sahaja sudah 15 halaman. Masalah kajian kita ambil yang betul-betul penting sahaja. Masalah kajian terlalu panjang lebar bersemangat sangat sampai 15 halaman, dah jadi salah. Permasalahan kajian fokuskan ikut objektif. Objektif ada 2, 2 perengganlah permasalahan kajian tetapi padat walaupun ringkas. Yang selebihnya sorotan dan jurang pada bab 2. Paling lebih pun 12, tetapi jangan kurang 8. Tetapi jangan lebih 15 takut seperti bab 2 sebab pemeriksa akan potong-potong. Jadi, kita ingat ya dalam bab 1 ini.

6. Definition of Operational & Study Organization (Chapter 1) #LetsWriteAThesis

Next, in chapter 1 we go to 1.8 which is the operational definition. Ok this is a bit difficult, sometimes student is a bit confused. Operational means about the definition of the study we conduct. Not the definition of the concept, not the definition of a sample of students do, what the meaning of the passage, 1. What does 1 script, 1 textual, 1 animation, 1 story, 1 people. Its wrong, we do not want that definition. If the definition of each one, students will refer to the whole dictionary only and all types of dictionaries. Don't! So operational is about our study. Usually this operational definition is minimum 2 and maximum 3, about how we want to conduct this study so that when the reader just reads, oh this is what he means. So if we look at this topic, we can take one of textual discourse, yet one animation script Malay folklore. If we want to differentiate the animated script, it has nothing to do. So we can go on, for this title there may be two. Other titles may have three. If we take a title from engineering for example, maybe operational there are many reasons for many variables. Even if it is from a Science thesis, there are many variables that allow us to make an operational definition so that the examiner understands what it has to do with the thesis. If we look at the thesis in economic form, so is it. There are many variables, maybe more than 3. So for this one, we focus on 2, you can do this then put for example, textual discourse but the textual discourse you want to make this operational definition must be related to the study. Make sure that take and there should be a reference. There is one way, 1 means you create a textual discourse, related to the study you. Textual discourse that focuses on animated script, this textual discourse will be analyzed using 3 elements. Examples of these 3 elements are content, context and assumptions. So according Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), textual discourse what is it, there may be references 1.8.2 and also the animation script Malay folklore. This should be related to your study, describe briefly. Malay folklore animation script consists of 20 stories, because the thesis analyzed 20 stories. So this animated script is what it looks like, description. Perhaps this animation script you describe Malay folklore related to our study, there was no reference, not acceptable because the definition of what is related to the review body. So, there are 2 ways, one way, have a reference, this has a reference, this has a reference. Secondly, there is no reference, it means you make a description. The description of the textual discourse in terms of the context you have a thesis. So no reference, both are acceptable. But like I said before, consult a supervisor. If the supervisor says there is a reference, place a reference. If the supervisor says it's okay, I believe if there is no reference I understand, and this actually does not need a reference because it is related to your reference. Even acceptable. We have different opinions, different schools so different schools of taught so our thoughts are different. So if there are 1 million supervisors, there are 1 million different thoughts. It is up to the supervisor. Like me if I say it is not necessary because it is related to the study of how you want to conduct a name study is operational, operation. If there is a reference, make sure not to refer to the dictionary. Why do you want to refer to the dictionary? Refer to the studies, not the dictionary. According to the Fourth Edition Hall Language Dictionary, textual discourse is.... cannot, that we also know. Do not refer to the dictionary. So, we refer to studies from others. One can be a reference, the second there is a reference can be accepted, it depends on the respective supervisor. If the supervisor says yes, accept, it is necessary to comply with the supervisor's words. So we see, we proceed to 1.9 which is the study organization. The organization of this study is actually up to the individual / student / supervisor. Often I will ask PhD students to place a study organization, sometimes even Master students can, not even place, if necessary. The organization of this study you made in the form of paragraphs. So the first paragraph, what is in chapter 1, then the second paragraph is what is chapter 2, we want to make briefly our organization so that when the supervisor reads, oh chapter 1 there is this apparently. Organize our thesis regularly, so the paragraphs are in summary only. Because every introduction in the chapter has already been said, but in the organization of this study we have to state briefly what is available. PhD student I do compel so that he himself can understand his study every chapter. If the Master student wants to do it, he can't do it. Bachelors also, even Diploma students have no problem if they want to do it to the supervisor. Finally, 1.10 just came to a conclusion, all chapters must have a conclusion. There is no conclusion cannot, we want to conclude what is in the chapter. I found that there is a thesis that has no conclusion, depending on the sudden entry of chapter 2. So there is no continuation of chapter 1 with chapter 2. Like chapter 1 there is another chapter, like there is another entity. It has nothing to do with chapter 2. We have to have a conclusion, summarize what is in chapter 1. Remember the last sentence, we have to put it in relation to the next chapter which is chapter 2 will discuss the highlights of the study ... then we see there is continuity between chapter 1 with chapter 2. Similar to the other chapters. The end of the conclusion must state what is in the next chapter. Sometimes there are unnecessary word supervisors because of different thoughts. When different we are satisfied and accept. We finished chapter 1, forgot to talk about the page. How many pages of chapter 1 is Prof? Chapter 1 pages are about 8-10 only. That is what I say is dangerous because there are students up to 30 because the study problem alone is already 15 pages. The problem of the study we take is really important only. The problem of the study is too long, it is very enthusiastic up to 15 pages, so it is wrong. The problems of the study focus on the objectives. The objective is to have 2, 2 paragraphs of the study problem but concise even concise. The rest are highlights and gaps in chapter 2. At least 12, but do not be less than 8. But do not be more than 15 afraid like chapter 2 because the examiner will cut it. So, we have to remember this chapter 1.

Rujukan Video:

https://youtu.be/6bANk-CrrhI

Bukti Subscribe:

Bukti Kehadiran Pelajar: